![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Solihull, in The Forest of Arden, Warwickshire!
Posts: 2,650
Party: None
![]() |
I like to think I am reasonably seasoned in the ways of British politics. The notion of the lame-duck has been around for a long time. Why then did Michael Howard conceivably think he could carry on until the end of the year? He's made himself a lame-duck. Why on earth?!
The Tories are still not capable of being seen as the "natural party of government" without some idea of leadership :?
__________________
www.westminster-whispers.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 731
![]() |
Quote:
Its the only thing i can think of. regards, Gareth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,096
![]() |
Mr Howard wants to stay leader untill the Autumn or later for one reason only: so he can change the party's leadership rules and prevent David Davies from winning the crown and thereby ensure a 'moderniser' such as the Harry Enfield Tory Boy character David Cameron succeeds him! :roll:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]