What the man in the interview says was about the American way of life so i thought i would venture to the academic ,not for any certificate of approval ,but to put into question what this man in the clip was saying .
I had heard that even scientists were saying there was a new study in science that was a kind of psudo science called Social science ...........so off i went to study Social science with the OU .
I ended up having to withdraw from the course because i was'nt able to stand underneath the given veiw of the course material and found that only by moving away from what i began to call " its scripture " could i explain my thinking of the course material .
I had already stated my dyslexia ...and i was told ,its ok you arnt that bad and because its a course of study that isnt gammaticaly oriented you will be fine .
Then as soon as i start not to understand ( meaning stand under ) the course material .........my tutor was saying things like .......you are failing to UNDERSTAND .........and this is a first level course ..........your answeres may be relevant to a third year course .
This method of teaching i was already familiar with in the religious way of educating where you are told ....all you have ever known or made of life is a missundrstanding ......you need to return to MILK before you can even have what it is needed to have before you even have the capability to understand .
Well yes i agree with you there because the classic case of a brainwashed person is to have his belief and thinking replaced by what an instructor wants to replace it with .And that would seem to be anything but thinking .
My tutor completely closed avenues of comunication ............and so i withdrew from the course all the richer in thinking of what education is .
And it is directly in line with what the man was saying happened in the States .
My analagy of when scientific thinking was first exampled was within scripture as wrote by the scriptural writer ( not by the implimenter of religion ) but the writers of scripture were the first scientific thinkers of the human condition ........they were just in a time that thought that such wisdoms were best kept under the concealment of allegory .I held science was redefined in the rennasonce not invented .
My tutor was horrified that i would say such things uniting science and religion as one and the same ..........................but i ask you has not the same been done with science as was done by scripture .................it has become hidden in the name of national security .
Another of my thinkings that didnt fit with social science was that when such a thing as science was applied to the subjective word ............we ended up with the revers of good in our societies .
(Example ) social science saw a problem of not enough housing and too many people ...........all the logic of the classical sciences was applied to the social sciences to come up with high rise flats and housing .They either didnt care or did not fully understand that cirtain conditions would change our behaviour ......................look at the kind of behaviour that tower blocks created .
The only way that science can become a study of society and the social is by making a subjective population into an objective population ( and for thoughs of you who dont know ,objective means it does not change ...where sujective means it changes acording to enviroment or other factors ) .
THINKING is the very thing that gives us our subjectivity................and it is this very atribute that is the most obstructing attribute that stops the psudo social science having its success that its nearest relative had in conquering the world ....the classic sciences .
Dont ever give your thinking away ...not for all the certificates of education in the world .Be who you are based on what you experiance ....not what you are told .....ITS A LIE


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks