![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |||
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,765
![]() |
Quote:
A lot of so called black is really just imitation yardie gang culture and the white and mixed race try harder Quote:
Quote:
By real Londoner do you mean Bow Bells (not E3) or some little middle class suburb ?
__________________
"That government is best which governs least." "This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries". "To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful." |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,201
![]() |
Unlike some I've finished school Barbara.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state." -Bruce Schneier How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it. Edward Abbey Leopold Kohr. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 350
![]() |
Gun crime has soared in the UK since guns were banned, the problem is that although there is a severe penalty of 5 years in jail for possession of a firearm ( even if not used or an old war souvenir) criminals are not particularly worried by this because for them a gun is a symbol of power.
Effectively it has increased the general unease that exists in this country about the gang/gun culture. All it did was to mess up the lives of tens of thousands of ordinary citizens who enjoyed the membership of gun clubs and other shooting activities. Although we remain one of the leading nations in shooting competitions e.g Olympics it is far easier for our competitors to train abroad than in this country as the facilities to deo so here are few and far between. NO WAY should Canada go down the route of banning firearms. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 637
![]() |
Sadly emotion guided the decision to ban guns, it was not logical but that is the way many decisions are made . As has been said many times law based on one or two events is usually bad law.
The population in this country was never ever armed to the teeth with guns, it was a hobby enjoyed by many and banning did nothing to increase the security or wellbeing of the average citizen and just gave the criminal element a significant advantage since they were quite willing to ignore the law and as a result the number of guns in criminal hands has escalated dramatically, it is extremely easy to get a gun . |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,661
![]() |
Quote:
But I'm sure it's definitely not the government...... ![]()
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed. cointelpro/halfwits: Akria,Clippo,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist,MikeUK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 175
![]() |
The final dis-arming of the populace was a knee-jerk reaction to the events of Dunblane. It was just the handwringing "...think of the children" response this government needed to 'justify' the act of leaving the citizens of the UK defenceless against violent homebreaking crims and leaving the state with the effective monopoly on the use of co-ercive force. Just WHY did Jack Straw(man) and Tony (Miranda) Blair impose an unprecedented 100 year ban on dissemination of the documents relating to the Dunblane 'massacre'? It wan't a massacre, it was one lone peadophile nut job that the police failed to pick up after ample warning. Google it to find out the supplementary facts behind Dunblane and the masonic involvement that secured this psyhopath's gun licence despite continual reccomendations (and a hefty track record) from the lower ranks to withdraw his permit. All part of the plan to get the ducks in a row and leave us prey to any tyrannical regime that appears over the political horizon. Nothing wrong with chucking lead at the right target.
Last edited by The Guvnah; 19-04-2008 at 02:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 350
![]() |
The police advise 2 sources for the guns :-
Ireland ,there are a lot of guns in circulation and though there has been some decommissioning many handguns were retained by their owners , the cross Irish sea routes are no longer given the surveillance that they would have been 10 years ago ,all available anti-terrorist police concentrate on Islamic terrorists. East Europe ,in particular , and the EU , in general . If you fly from the EU to Uk there is a good chance you would be stopped but coming across by sea almost nil particularly if you arrive privately or as crew on a merchant navy (incl trawlers) ship, even passengers on the cross channel would stand a good chance of not being stopped but any professional criminal would use one of the previously mentioned routes in. Absolutely no point in banning guns as long as suppply routes from other sources are easily accessible. All you do is put the majority at the mercy of criminal elements and/or a dictatorial Govt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in a parralell universe
Posts: 827
![]() |
If you are going to ban firearms you have to have severe deterents.When we rightly or wrongly banned firearms we should have stated that anyone caught in possesion gets 20 years.You have to make the punnishment make the crime an unrealistic risk
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]