British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > General Politics > British police-state


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-07-2007, 10:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
arden forester's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Solihull, in The Forest of Arden, Warwickshire!
Posts: 2,660
Party: None
arden forester is just starting out
Default West Midlands police state?

The BNP has posted a fairly long diatribe against the activities of West Midlands Police. My point in all the activities of the police in this country against the BNP is that it is a complete waste of time acting as agents provocateurs. It only gives the BNP the rightful excuse to say that the police are interfering in the democratic process.

If lawbreaking occurs, let the accused stand trial for transgressing the law. But we should all be on our guard against the police acting as some kind of guardian of the electorate's wellbeing.

What the BNP accuse West Midlands Police of is a simple disgrace if true. Will New Labour bring these ballot riggers to justice?

The very idea that 400 nomination signers were contacted defies all that is seen as being of British fair play and decency. Let the Chief Constable say that he wants the BNP banned as a legal political party. But he can't because that would expose him as political busybody.

If it's the BNP now, what about the Christian Party (seen as anti-gay) or UKIP (seen as anti-establishment) or Respect (let's get George today). We need to nip it in the bud!

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=1617

Last edited by arden forester; 17-07-2007 at 10:43 PM. Reason: adding link
arden forester is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 18-07-2007, 09:48 AM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Being able to interfere with and annoy the BNP is probably every Guardianistas wet dream - hence why all Chief Constables allow disgraceful behaviour against the BNP and its members.

Whatever happened to upholding the law without fear or favour?

Obviously went out the window to meet diversity targets.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2007, 02:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 361
jim h is just starting out
Default

I am most definitely not a BNP supporter but even if half of this is true then the Chief Constable needs to explain what is going on
jim h is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2007, 02:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
arden forester's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Solihull, in The Forest of Arden, Warwickshire!
Posts: 2,660
Party: None
arden forester is just starting out
Default Time Wasting in Brum

What I'd dearly like to know is how much it cost to visit all those who signed the nomination papers. Assuming some signed for all three in a ward, it still makes a lot of police time. Is it another thing the Chief Constable can say is not covered by Freedom of Information?
arden forester is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2007, 02:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arden forester View Post
What I'd dearly like to know is how much it cost to visit all those who signed the nomination papers.
They did what? Should the Police be interfering in democratic elections like this?

Is all it takes to get a visit from the Police these days really signing a perfectly legitimate nomination form for a legitimate candidate who's standing for a legitimate party?

If so, that's both disgusting and wholly inappropriate for any democratic society.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-2007, 03:05 PM   #6 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,589
TonyG is just starting out
Default

You have to admire the BNP for the gall in writing some of this stuff:

Quote:
Now imagine the scenario if you are a Christian West Indian surrounded by Somalians or a Sikh living amongst Muslim neighbours, If police officers pulled up outside your house and asked bluntly whether or not you support the BNP what would you say?
given that they would all be given a passage out of the country by the BNP, to suggest that this is disingenuous would be giving them a compliment!
"Hey, boys, I know you don't belong here, and we are going to boot you out soon, but don't worry, we're on your side!"
__________________
If you don't think you can change the world, who do you expect to do it for you?

----

http://www.mercola.com/townofallopat...ofallopath.htm
TonyG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07-2007, 06:24 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,048
IceDragon is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arden forester View Post
If it's the BNP now, what about the Christian Party (seen as anti-gay) or UKIP (seen as anti-establishment) or Respect (let's get George today). We need to nip it in the bud!

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=1617
Indeed, I have always maintained that whatever action is taken against the BNP both politically and legally is a test case for what will be dealt out to anyone who opposes the political ideology of whatever party happens to be in government at the time. BNP today, Who next?
IceDragon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 08:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Western Missouri
Posts: 29
mordechai is just starting out
Default

Wonders never cease.
mordechai is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0