Thread: Ali Dizaei on trial again

[QUOTE=alemcodon;1309893]

Originally Posted by Road_Hog

Okay, two things. Is the claimant a Muslim and is the defendant a Muslim? Yes is the answer. So I haven't just dragged Islam into it. One is a police officer who has been investigated several times and convicted. The other is a convicted benefit thief. Islam tells you that it is okay to take benefit (money) from the infidels because Britain is Dar al Harb (house of war). Why are so many mini-cab drivers Muslim (usually Pakistanis)? because it's one of the few jobs left that is cash in hand and makes claiming benefits easier.

All these lingos you come out with taqqiyah and dar al wotever, I aint even heard of these lingos so where the hell are you pulling them outa?

These are not lingos, they are the teachings of the Qur'an and Hadiths from your great prophet the paedophile Mohammed.

Originally Posted by longbow64

Basically to cut a very long story short, I was sick of getting into fights in rough night clubs that my misses enjoyed finsihing Sat night in, i.e tried to nick my goretex jacket.
So I banned visiting them, but she went anyway the next week and I saw my arris and locked her out, and threw the laundry basket out of the top front window onto the garden, and some of her clothes, a bag of rubbish, (don't ask me why).

She came home, couldn't get in and called the cops then said bash the door down, but they could not do that, it was very cold and I knew they were ****** off with me because I would not let them in. Eventually I decided to let the WPC in whom I knew, so I opened the front door and turned to open the inner for her at which point the male cop jumped on me from behind and arrested me, it was pointless fighting them, when he handcuffed me he put his hand over my nose and mouth to try to stop me breathing.

When we got the station, I was in the van and could hear the duty Sgt saying what are you going to charge him with?, then bollocking the male cop, then saying you are going to have to say he went for her. So they said I went to let her in the house, changed my mind and repeatedly smashed the door on her, pinning her in the frame etc, etc, etc, miraculously she was uninjured.

They took a drunken statement from the misses full of unthruths, the following day she tried to make a retractment, they told her that 'the law had changed and that wasn't poss', she worked in a dom violence refuge and contacted her local copper who was appaled and complained to the staions CSup, she then made a retraction statement that never got to the CPS, they binned it.

In court I had a barrister, the barrister said the 3 masons will always side with the cops, it wasn't an electable offence so you can't go to Crown, any way in the end I agreed to accept a bindover.

I think you need to work on your relationship or find another partner. No judgement intended.
It's great you shared these experiences, I had a number of runs in a long time ago, it's a bit of a joke now by my police friends as we all grew up together and they were there on some of the occasions. One of them says straight up that's their loads of masons in the force but you can spot them a mile away and they're are harmless. I am not so sure.

What I do find bang out of order is how the masons do not have to declare their membership in the police.


Again, thanks for sharing.

I think you need to work on your relationship or find another partner.

Indeed!

Longbow,

It is not your place to 'ban' your wife, still less your partner from visiting clubs you don't like, although it is your right not to accompany her and to question her motivation for going.

It may be that she enjoys the dancing the music and a few drinks with friends, and its quite harmless. On the other hand if her main purpose is flirting with other guys, and maybe more, then you should discuss her behaviour with her (when everyone is calm and sober)and make it clear that you dont feel the two of you are compatible, as this isnt the way you want to live. The most important thing is not to resort to silly acts of aggression such as locking her out and triggerring a 'domestic'.

Originally Posted by flamingreen

Indeed!

Longbow,

It is not your place to 'ban' your wife, still less your partner from visiting clubs you don't like, although it is your right not to accompany her and to question her motivation for going.

It may be that she enjoys the dancing the music and a few drinks with friends, and its quite harmless. On the other hand if her main purpose is flirting with other guys, and maybe more, then you should discuss her behaviour with her (when everyone is calm and sober)and make it clear that you dont feel the two of you are compatible, as this isnt the way you want to live. The most important thing is not to resort to silly acts of aggression such as locking her out and triggerring a 'domestic'.

Agree there. Always remember you do not own anyone, not even your partner or your wife. Most anger stems from the fear of change, a sense one might not be able to cope, and a deep seated low esteem.
If there is a split, expect to feel sick and lost, it is normal. Go out and have some fun, even engage in a few short term relationships, there are lots of women out there who prefer to keep men at a safe distance and so if you come across one, enjoy the fun, but do not fool yourself into thinking its love. After a while you will regain your confidence and find someone more permanent. Infatuation and lust is not love.
And don't forget the old rules; Men give love to gain sex, Women give sex to gain love. Always use that as a measuring rule, but make your mind up over time.
If the missus is flirting and your finding out, she might be giving you a hint to take a bit more attention to her.
Do not make any threats, say something that will burn down bridges, and never threaten the other guy, sometimes they don't even realise they are being used.

All the best,

Agony Uncle Gentle Thunder.

Originally Posted by Gentle Thunder

Why do you say that Jason, about Masons declaring their membership? Nothing wrong with Masonry. If in the future you ever get invited to join, then do so, you can always leave if you find out it is anyway bad or evil. I have been a Mason for 13 years, and although I don't go to lodge, it is a good thing. What is real funny is the silly theory's about what we get up to.

I am not so sure, Gentle Thunder but after reading some of your posts it is possible you may make me reconsider some of my thoughts.
The thing is the BNP membership was exposed (not that I was ever a member) and no prosections were brought but members that were teachers or policeman were then publicly criticised to belonging to a legal political party but why is membership to a secret club allowed when the BNP membership is not or at least heavily discouraged?