Inspector Toby Day, 37, accessed the police national computer seeking details of his wife's boyfriend. He was suspended in September and was dismissed for it last week. On Thursday afternoon, at around 4pm, he ran amok with a knife, killing Samantha, 38, and six-year-old Genevieve, and seriously injuring the couple’s 15-year-old daughter and 13-year-old son.
One report of the story: Melton Mowbray: Police inspector killed wife and daughter after being sacked - Telegraph
Wait until the meglomaniacs get their way and are permitted to carry firearms.
Little Englander (bigoted)
a very sad news , great pressure make him down ?
![]()
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass...it's about learning how to dance in the rain
Shows the poor quality of Senior Police in the UK....
No it doesn't, it shows that the higher some people get, the more superior they think they are.
I was told by an Inspector, "We can do what we want."
Then when I got an Inspector to investigate the case and he found that two officers should be reprimanded, all documents of the case was lost and he produced something that was a lie, and the IPCC accepted the lies, so I can now conclude that because some police officers and inspectors deal with criminals they too become criminals themselves and the honest adults and children of the country are treat like criminals by the police who are supposed to be their to protect them, how sad.
The system needs to be changed so that any wrong doing can be put right without any blame, instead it should be acting as irrationally because of what had been said to them, on minor incidents. The reason I say this, then maybe, someone who was in the police may have seen something that did not seem right and come forward before this senior officer had carried out this awful crime.
All to often it is seen as them against us, but who is us, that is the question, because most of us are law abiding citizens who used to believe that the police were there to protect us, then find that some of them are their to protect their friends whether they are in the right or in the wrong, better for all to do the right thing, than hide the truth. That's why I say, put things right, rather than make the whole station wrong, because what you have then is having no confidence in the full station.
Lorraine. it's about time you looked at the UK Column they are asking the very same questions, most police are good but there are some that are acting against the people and some forces in particular
just google:
Ian Puddick - police gave his mobile details to a private security company that hacked it sending malicious messages,
David Kelly body moved and couldn't have been suicide (per a number of doctors) now under the 70 year secrecy ruling
Holly Greig repeatedly sexually abused and uncle murdered (originally accepted as suicide) but the police can't prosecute.
Police passing on car accident details too claims marketing companies
Unless we take stand we will go the way of the Soviet Union or the Balkans.
LAWFUL REBELLION ..........It's our Constitutional right!
Anyone can go nuts but it's disgusting that he killed his family first, before killing himself. It seems to happen that way sometimes.
Heartening to see the police taking bad behaviour seriously though. Hopefully his wasn't a token sacking.
I think therefore I am a nuisance.
It may have been a token sacking after all - according to http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...Q2f6NGTlddSxag 1388 officers were disciplined in 2009, and according to Figures highlight data breaches by police | Guardian Government Computing | Guardian Professional, between 2007 and 2010, 904 police employees were disciplined for data protection breaches.
So, out of around 140000 police officers, approximately 1% were disciplined in 2009. If they are anything like the Catholic Church, or MP's, they will be covering up to preserve their reputation so I wonder what the detection rate is amongst police officers, given that the detection rate for recorded crime is 28%.
Even using the bare minimum of the statistic of 1% per annum, the stats for the last 3 years gives us an awful lot of dodgy policemen.
Last edited by dloper; 30-12-2011 at 03:35 PM.
I think therefore I am a nuisance.
How many more have ridiculed the innocent, and never been disciplined.
The sad fact is when you make a complaint, they want you to sign a form so they will carry out their own investigation and take discipline into their own hands, however if you sign the form, then they could just dismiss the fact that faults have been made. If you decide not to sign the form, then they can carry out the investigation and in my case tell you that two officers will be disciplined, then a few months down the line, tell you they have lost all the original documentation and produce a report that bears no resemblance of what they told you. They can also lie in the report, but according to the IPCC all the lies and differences are discrepancies, how would that letter stand up in court in front of a judge? How many discrepancies do you need to decide something is seriously wrong with the system. The problem I found that they put children's lives at risk, but they were not interested and neither was the IPCC, even though the child made a complaint at the police station about threats against him which were not acted upon.
An innocent person who is truthful has nothing to lose, a system that is full of flaws needs to be reformed to bring trust into the equation, trust for the innocent person is most important, not money, not compensation, trust and honesty, I would rather a police officer that made a mistake have the chance to put it right and learn from the mistake, unless ofcourse he was a bad penny, that's totally different, however the system does have many flaws or as the IPCC would say, many bad discrepancies.
Well lorraine, all I can say to you is never allow the police to speak to you, formally or informally, without having your own record of what was said. If it's in the street, have a witness present and try to record the conversation if you can. If it's a formal interview, 'helping the police with their enquiries' at a police station say nothing until you have a solicitor present. And taped interviews are all very well, giving you the illusion that there is now a formal record, but it may be convenient to lose the tape, so don't trust them to have your best interests, or the interests of justice, at the heart of what they're doing. Keep your own record and beware of the context of what you say being misconstrued too - Lets say the police charge you with something after the appropriate caution and write down your response . You may say 'I did that?' but what gets construed is that you confessed, and said 'I did that'.
Having an independent record of what transpired is the best insurance you can have. It makes it very difficult for the police to collude in 'losing' evidence. It sounds like your experience has taught you this already though.
Last edited by dloper; 31-12-2011 at 12:39 AM.
I think therefore I am a nuisance.
Bookmarks