+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 27 FirstFirst ... 4 12 13 14 15 16 24 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 262

Thread: BNP Chairmanīs statement on the Gaza incident

  1. #131
    Trusted Member Wowbanger TIP is a jewel in the rough Wowbanger TIP is a jewel in the rough Wowbanger TIP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    unacknowledged legislator of the world
    Posts
    7,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by angelman View Post
    BNP might well have taken this stance of nothing to do with us, but that just shows why a lot of people will never be able to vote for them. If they are to be taken as a serious political party, then surely they should have a foreign policy. I know the likes of TIP and London Orbital say that it has nothing to do with us, but if a party can't show that it has decent foreign policies, are we supposed to take them seriously on other parts of life and the economy?
    Where have you been? I've been arguing Israel's case for weeks at great length (and élan and success as usual).

    Griffin is wrong, nationalism does not preclude a position on the affairs, even internal affairs of other nations.

    It is in the interests of a British nationalist government to make sure it has ideological allies and is not surrounded by internationalist and Imperialists. It also has a moral duty to ensure that it does what it can to bestow the right of democratic self determination on any people who want it.

    It does not have the right to interfere in another self determining democratic nation states internal business, but we can safely assume that the Foreign Office won't be surplus to requirements anytime soon.

    In practical terms a British Nationalist foreign policy would have to support Russia and Israel as these are the two most powerful nationalist states on Earth. But of course Griffin's position is not defined by Nationalism.
    immanentize the eschaton!

  2. #132
    Senior Member moon has some supporters moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cyberia
    Posts
    1,039

    Default

    British Conservatism;
    If the BNP say it is nothing to do with us then it is our foreign policy isnt it.
    Stay neutral unless British interests are concerned.
    Respect for international law is in British interests. The UK is too small to exist without it.


    Populist Lee;
    There's not one damn thing any of you can do about aggressive Zionism.
    Get used to it.
    You're wrong. Fascism is not a natural state of Man and fascists' tanks need fascist drivers.



    Wowbanger;
    It ( British nationalism ) also has a moral duty to ensure that it does what it can to bestow the right of democratic self determination on any people who want it.
    Then it should champion the Palestinians, using the tools of international law. Brits are never, ever, going to elect a bandit regime.
    Last edited by moon; 22-01-2009 at 08:42 AM.
    668..the neighbor of the beast
    http://www.wanted.org.il/ehud_barak_en.htm

  3. #133
    Trusted Member angelman is a jewel in the rough angelman is a jewel in the rough angelman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    here
    Posts
    6,255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wowbanger TIP View Post
    Where have you been? I've been arguing Israel's case for weeks at great length (and élan and success as usual).
    Yes you have - apologies.

    BC - I know where you are coming from but can't agree. You say that your (BNP) neutral stance is your foreign policy, but saying "It's nothing to do with us" is not even taking a neutral stance. It's a cop out. To me a neutral stance would be to comment about the situation and both sides, but not to pass judgement.

    Out of interest (and not sure if it has been covered) why was this statement released in the first place? Was he asked what he thought? If BNP were to take a neutral stance wouldn't it have been better not to even release this cop-out statement?

  4. #134
    Senior Member moon has some supporters moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cyberia
    Posts
    1,039

    Default

    Out of interest (and not sure if it has been covered) why was this statement released in the first place?
    I did contact the BNP and offered to help formulate a policy on Zionism if none existed. Perhaps lots of other people did too and the 'statement' is the result. Now I'm wondering if 'Mighty Erick's' take on the 'statement' is the general consensus. People do get a tad peeved having armored fascists dictating terms to the international community.
    Last edited by moon; 22-01-2009 at 08:52 AM.
    668..the neighbor of the beast
    http://www.wanted.org.il/ehud_barak_en.htm

  5. #135
    Senior Member whypatcondellisntfun is just starting out whypatcondellisntfun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by angelman View Post
    If BNP were to take a neutral stance wouldn't it have been better not to even release this cop-out statement?
    Er... That is what I said here : http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/592680-post124.html
    "I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin" - Enoch Powell

  6. #136
    Gardening Leave British-Conservatism has some supporters
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    11,950

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by angelman View Post
    Yes you have - apologies.

    BC - I know where you are coming from but can't agree. You say that your (BNP) neutral stance is your foreign policy, but saying "It's nothing to do with us" is not even taking a neutral stance. It's a cop out. To me a neutral stance would be to comment about the situation and both sides, but not to pass judgement.

    Out of interest (and not sure if it has been covered) why was this statement released in the first place? Was he asked what he thought? If BNP were to take a neutral stance wouldn't it have been better not to even release this cop-out statement?
    Read the article he does comment on both sides.

  7. #137
    Gardening Leave British-Conservatism has some supporters
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    11,950

    Default

    Interesting situation here.

    Nazis and Muslims v the BNP and Israel.

  8. #138
    Senior Member moon has some supporters moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cyberia
    Posts
    1,039

    Default

    Interesting situation here.

    Nazis and Muslims v the BNP and Israel.

    How do you manage to connect 'Nazis' with 'muslims' when the actions of the Zionist military in Gaza are closely comparable to the actions of the Nazi military in Warsaw ? What examples of 'muslim nazism' would you use to offset this query ?
    668..the neighbor of the beast
    http://www.wanted.org.il/ehud_barak_en.htm

  9. #139
    Trusted Member Wowbanger TIP is a jewel in the rough Wowbanger TIP is a jewel in the rough Wowbanger TIP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    unacknowledged legislator of the world
    Posts
    7,511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by British-Conservatism View Post
    Interesting situation here.

    Nazis and Muslims v the BNP and Israel.
    Actually the line up goes Progressives, Infanatlized kidults, Communists, Muslims and Nazis Vs Democratic Nationalism as represent by Israel.

    The BNP's position is far more nuanced.
    immanentize the eschaton!

  10. #140
    On A Break david H is doing well
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,087

    Default

    This is another from Reconquista on green arrow forum and shows how the socialists have become the Nazis while nationalists oppose anti-Semitism.

    The Green Arrow-Supporting the BNP - The March Of The Dhimmis - Reconquista

+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 27 FirstFirst ... 4 12 13 14 15 16 24 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts