Thread: The New 10 Commandments BBC2-Scotland Sunday 7 December 22.50-00.30,

If you don't want to pay the price of living amongst the people then don't. I am sure you can find a deserted island somewhere with no taxation to speak of.

Ah, now you are beginning to sound like a real Socialist. If you don't like people stealing from you, then desert your home and **** off. The same tactics the Mafia use.

You see, I can't see the point in replacing one Mafia, with another. Your Mafia sounds just as bad as the old one to me.

Originally Posted by SomersetYokel

I agree with Mr Dow. The US is a far better run and more democratic country than the UK and is a real country of talent and equality. How many Barack Obamas and Condy Rices have we seen running the UK government?

Despite their faults the US judiciary is separate from the Executive. Any one who listened to the Hutton whitewash on the Iraq war, dodgy dossiers ec can easily see UK judges are controlled by the Government.

The US legislature consists of two independent elected bodies again separate from the Executive who can, and frequently do, block the President's
wishes.

You can argue about the US health system but on every health outcome measure they perform better than the UK.

We need to consign the Royals to the trash can of history asap and accept and copy the US system of government.

This is where mkpdavies discovers who I would prefer for US president other than Ron Paul.

Do you know that I am the owner of Rice for President Yahoo Group and I have produced 88 pro-Rice videos collected together in my Peter Dow for Condi YouTube group?

Most recently for my Rice for President Yahoo Group, I published a movie review of 3 movies - Courting Condi, The Ten Commandments (1956) and the New Ten Commandments (that is the film which this topic is about).

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Ah, now you are beginning to sound like a real Socialist. If you don't like people stealing from you, then desert your home and **** off. The same tactics the Mafia use.

You see, I can't see the point in replacing one Mafia, with another. Your Mafia sounds just as bad as the old one to me.

Yeh well there is price to be paid for "your" home and that is the health and welfare costs of the people who built your home and of those who supply goods and services to you while you live there.

A democratic government isn't "mine" any more than it is yours - democracy means "government by all the people" and that includes you mkpdavies - yes you are a member of the government in a democracy so unless you are calling yourself a Mafia gangster ... I am not sure what you mean?

Originally Posted by Peter Dow

Yeh well there is price to be paid for "your" home and that is the health and welfare costs of the people who built your home and of those who supply goods and services to you while you live there.

A democratic government isn't "mine" any more than it is yours - democracy means "government by all the people" and that includes you mkpdavies - yes you are a member of the government in a democracy so unless you are calling yourself a Mafia gangster ... I am not sure what you mean?

You want to replace the tyranny of an individual, for the tyranny of the mob.

I see no benefit in doing that.

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

You want to replace the tyranny of an individual, for the tyranny of the mob.

I see no benefit in doing that.

No what we have NOW is the tyranny of the mob, done in the name of the individual monarch.

We need to end the mob rule mentality of majority dictatorship whereby the individual citizen or even elected representatives have no rights in practice.

We have no rights in practice because the state refuses to defend our rights (and often is the party actively denying us our rights) because the head of state is useless and never requires the state to do ANYTHING which the state officers don't want to do, such as defend people who criticise state incompetence and mismanagement.

We the oppressed need to rise up and defeat the mob by removing their inspiration and their excuse which is the monarch and the kingdom. So long as the mob has the monarch and the kingdom at its back there will be no stopping it.

By refusing to target the monarch, you are effectively passing out the burning torches, the drink and the ropes to the mob and asking them "Who are you going to lynch next to the tune of God Save the Queen?"

In this topic, YOU are the mob's number 1 defender and inciter.

Originally Posted by Peter Dow

No what we have NOW is the tyranny of the mob, done in the name of the individual monarch.

We need to end the mob rule mentality of majority dictatorship whereby the individual citizen or even elected representatives have no rights in practice.

We have no rights in practice because the state refuses to defend our rights (and often is the party actively denying us our rights) because the head of state is useless and never requires the state to do ANYTHING which the state officers don't want to do, such as defend people who criticise state incompetence and mismanagement.

We the oppressed need to rise up and defeat the mob by removing their inspiration and their excuse which is the monarch and the kingdom. So long as the mob has the monarch and the kingdom at its back there will be no stopping it.

By refusing to target the monarch, you are effectively passing out the burning torches, the drink and the ropes to the mob and asking them "Who are you going to lynch next to the tune of God Save the Queen?"

In this topic, YOU are the mob's number 1 defender and inciter.

Why don't you target her then? All I see you do, is prancing around with a banner, making people want to support the Royals more. You are probably their best recruiter.

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Why don't you target her then? All I see you do, is prancing around with a banner, making people want to support the Royals more. You are probably their best recruiter.

I do target her but I am not just a Scottish republican army foot-soldier - I am a standard bearer for the Scots and for the republican revolution against the UK monarchy - that is a different though an equally essential function to, say, a military sniper where the targeting involved is more obvious.

Before the sniper targets the enemy, the army of the nation for whom the sniper fights needs to be educated as to who the enemy is.

I am offering leadership and education for those who are interested in politics and the defence of freedom and capable of learning.

Disinterested, ignorant and stupid people who are not capable of education and who just "Ya! Boo!" anyone trying to explain matters of importance to them - are not really relevant to my political and standard bearer activities.

If all you have seen of my politics is the video and my comments here it is because you have neglected or refused or for some other reason NOT read my website but it is a website which most assuredly DOES target the Queen.



The best recruiter for the UK monarchy are the BBC royal correspondents and also the BBC when they broadcast events such as the Princes' concert - 5 hours of live music and pro-royal propaganda.

The BBC broadcasts something like 99.9% pro-royalty propaganda - the 10 minutes I was on in Scotland is part of the other 0.1% anti-royalty education.

But for only 10 minutes of republican TV in Scotland, it was a good use of 10 minutes - as for the detailed arguments which there was not time in 10 minutes to go in to - that is what the website is for in the first instance. Sure, it would great to be allowed an opportunity to broadcast more of the details.

Now once you have read my website, you will be in a more informed position to say whether or not YOU are wanting to support the royals more or less, if you are able to understand republican arguments in full.

Now for one republican, I do my fair share of the work. If all those who say they are "republicans" but who don't actually DO anything about targeting the monarchy instead supported my activities or did their own campaigning against the monarchy then we would get results that even the stupid can understand.

Remember, the stupid only understood that King Charles I was in the wrong, bad for the country and so on, AFTER he had had his head chopped off. Up until then the stupid people were absolutely sure that so-called republicans, Cromwell and that lot, were just prancing about making people support King Charles I more.

Cromwell was not prancing about making people support the King more, but that is what the stupid people thought. They were sure of it, in the way that stupid people are always sure.

Mass stupidity is an inevitable part of political life. I meet stupid people ALL the time. Stupid is as stupid does.

Originally Posted by John Connor

OK, I want all of my tax dollars spent on nude pictures of Cheryl Cole placed at strategic points around my locale.

No?

Thought not. Thief.

Well I have not taken a penny from you in tax - nor do I support the tax-raising activities of the UK where they have taken money from you or from anyone - so it is not fair of you to accuse me of being a thief.

Although I note you say "dollars" and we Britons don't use dollars much but British pounds sterling - and the good news about that is the Scottish pound notes don't have the Queen's face on them though the English are not so lucky.

So I suggest you make your accusations of "thief" to those who are taxing you - the state where you live - the USA? - or to your fellow nationals - Americans or whatever.

Curious that you describe your location as

"Hard Working Families' Socialist Republic of Untied Kingdomistan"

I note that you have made 1,156 posts yet have never taken the time to change "Untied" to "United" or do you mean "untied"?

On the other hand, Wikipedia assures me that Cheryl Cole is a British singer - so you listen to British music but don't use our currency? Nothing unusual in that - I listen to American singers but don't use American dollars.

You just seem to be all over the place John - a mixed up kind of guy. Would that be a fair first impression?

If you are not here in the British Isles, have you ever considering visiting us here in Britain John? You would be most welcome I am sure.