What a crock of *****. Watch the video and listen to what the chairman says. How ever many times you repeat the lie “ The BNP is Bust/Insolvent/Bankrupt/Liquidated” blah blah-it does not and will not make it come true. Now let’s get on with job of expelling the traitors and forging ahead as a united party.
Just because some people voice concerns about the finances, Dowson or whatever else it does not make them a traitor. NG admitted at the Tameside meeting that the Party is indeed in debt, somthing he had not confirmed before and may not have done had it not been raised as part of the nomination process. Has this not vindicated those that voiced their concerns?
Addmittedly there may be some on here that will make up false stories just to cause trouble and dissention, but they are not traitors as they are probably UAF/Searchlight anyway and not members of the party.
Enough, no more, tis not so sweet now as it was before.
If the BNP’s debts are running at 25% of its turnover, which Nick “East Midlands regional funds” Gri££in claims was £1,900,000 in 2009, then it is most unlikely that the party can pay its creditors. The comparison with Le Pen’s party is spurious. The BNP has no substantial fixed assets (whereas the Front National owned an impressive headquarters building). What’s more, the socio-economic base of the Front National is higher: while its core vote is working class, it has many middle class and even upper class supporters, whereas the BNP does not. The BNP’s working class support base has given very generously in support of the Euro and general election campaigns. The Barking debacle has demoralized naïve supporters worked up to a fever pitch of excitement by their reckless leader, who never takes any thought for the morrow, with serious consequences when the morrow came on 7th May. Dow$on has milked the cash cow dry, so that donations are down to a trickle. No way can Dow$on and Gri££in find c. £450,000. Gri££in is looking at a second bankruptcy (he was made bankrupt in the Welshpool County Court with debts exceeding £70,000 on 16th June 1994). When he goes down, the work of rebuilding can begin, though not under the name BNP, which will belong to the liquidator of the party.
Last edited by George Smiley; 13-08-2010 at 06:41 AM.
¡Llora, llora urutaú, en las ramas del yatay . . . ya no existe el Paraguay donde nací como tú¡
I think the last sentence is very interesting, certain people have a fantasy that when Nick Griffin / BNP go bankrupt the good guys (Eddy Butler etc) can step in and using the name BNP rebuild the party. Unfortunately, a new party will be needed and we are wasting time...!
The liquitator will own the name, membership and what few assets the BNP has however like other buisnesses these can be bought and used again of course not by the people who started it all. The liquitator could sell of the whole lot for the sum of money owed, less than what they are owed or sell of each part individually.
Enoch Powell was right!
What's the point in buying the name, Westaphilia? The party has an image that is the equivalent of Ian Huntley. British Nationalism needs to climb out of the gutter, I don't care what activism people have done in the past, if they're ****, they're ****, and the electorate will know it.
My blog. My Twitter "Feed 'im to the pigs, Errol"
Bookmarks