Definition of britishness - aims & goals
QUESTIONS - YOUR AIMS AND GOALS
Why cannot a person be of colour and be British and be allowed to live in the UK?
Why must Britishness be defined by colour of skin and ethnicity and race?
Why do you want Britian to be a Christian country, when the originator of Christianity was a non-white, Israelie Jew?
All the writings in the Bible, Old and New Testament which you acknowledge as being 'Christian' have been written by non-white Jews, so why would you want the religion of Christianity which is based on the teachings of a foreign Israelie Jew to be the fabric of your new non-white, 'no foreigners allowed' UK society?
Why do you want the UK to be a Christian country and yet not embrace the spirit of the teachings of Christ?
Indeed, do you know the teaching of Christ? And if so, how do you reconcile them to your desire for a totally white race society that does not embrace people from other cultures and races who want to live and work and contribute to UK society?
Why would you want to embrace the culture of Christianity, which is rooted in Judaism, which is Jewish, which is alien, foreign, non-white and Jewish when you say you don't want people of colour or different religious backgrounds living in this country.
If the BNP wants a Christian society, then that will embrace Catholisism.
Catholics believe that the wine drunk at Mass turns into the blood of Christ. How do you feel about Catholics drinking wine they believe has been changed into the blood of a non-white, foreign Jew?
Do you really want millions of Catholics in this country believing they are drinking the blood of a Jew?
If no, Why? and if yes, Why?
If you say the UK should be a Christian country, then why cannot non-white people and people of other races and religions who have embraced Christianity live here?
What is the difference between the aims and goals of the BNP and Fascism?
How do YOU define Fascism and why do not want to be called a Fascist?
What is wrong with being a Fascist?
What is wrong with being a Nazi?
Why do you think your leader Nick Griffin is referred to as a 'Holocaust Denier', and what do YOU understand by the term Holocaust Denier?
Does it concern you that your leader Nick Griffin is so negative and acidic in his comments when he is talking about the Holocaust.
Does it concern you when you see your Leader Nick Griffin smirking when talking about the Holocaust in which 3 million people were murdered?
What does this smirking reveal about Nick Griffin?
Why do you want Nick Griffin as the leader of the BNP?
What would you like to change about the BNP?
Would you like to change the leader of your party. If no, Why? and if yes, Why?
How do you explain long-standing BNP members leaving your party, because they are concerned with racist elements that are not being dealt with or expelled from the party?
Last edited by KATERINA; 01-05-2010 at 06:59 AM.
I'm with UKIP where race is never really mentioned. Britons of all colours and ethnic origins have a common enemy: the ruling elite. A vote for the BNP is a vote for the EU.
I think when it comes to it, These questions are invalid, BNP basically want to go back to when they "Feel" the British were at their best culturally and ethically "After WWII"
British By Birth... English By The Grace Of God.
Melanie,Originally Posted by MELANIE PHILIPS
The BNP say that a coloured person can be civically British and live in the UK.
Do you deny that the English exist as an ethnic group? It is natural to want to preserve your own kind and live in a country with people who are 'like' you. Would you deny Aboriginal australians their identity? If I was to move to the Red Centre of Australia and father a family there, would that make my children Aboriginal Australians?
Melannie only says those things about Whites. She is a fanatical Zionist with the most evil wishes for Palestinians. Its alright for her but not for us!
David, I am neither a fanatical Zionist nor do I wish any evil whatsoever for Palestinians. I see them as my brothers and sisters. ANY Palestinian person is welcome in my home.
Gill, I am shocked that you should consider all my questions to be invalid. How are you going to engage and persaude the electorate if you can't address these questions. You say the BNP want to go back to when they FEEL the British were at their best culturally and ethically, after WW2, but 'feelings' vary, and who makes this decision that this period of history was the 'best' period. Melanie
Nobody is going to answer all those loaded questions, especially from yourself.
Simple fact is do you really expect a Nation that was racially homogenous for thousands of years to be so radically altered by its ruling elite without any form opposition?
Melanie, I can't answer your questions as I am not a BNP supporter, but I would be interested to know if you plan to vote BNP next Thursday, and if not, why not?
I'd like to respond to a few of these questions (several can be put to rest with the same answer). I'm not a BNP member, but where the BNP provide Britain's only hope, I am a supporter. Overall, I'm skeptical of politics - I believe it largely to be a farce.
A person can be of colour, be civically British and be allowed to live in the UK - of course. Who, including the BNP, says anything else?
For some, Britishness is a blanket term for the several ethnic groups who have rightfully occupied these isles for millenia. For some, Britishness is an entirely civic term. But what any student of truth and history should be able to agree upon is that the terms 'English', 'Welsh', 'Scottish' and 'Irish' refer specifically to ethnic groups. One cannot choose to belong to an ethnic group - one is born into it. It has been this way since time immemorial. The real question is: WHY are some groups so intent upon completely undermining this natural order for good? WHO are the people pushing such agendas? and WHY is it that only the ethnic groups of Europe are subject to this unravelling of cultural and genetic heritage?
I don't. I'd prefer Britain to be a land of the old spiritual ways - paganism, heathenism and shamanism. But if I must choose between Christianity, Islam and Atheism, I'll choose the one which has given most, for longest to British culture.
Forgive me for saying, but this is a stupid question. The burden of proof lies squarely on the accuser. A better, more fruitful question would be: What is the difference between the aims and goals of the old parties and Fascism?
Well, there's a dictionary definition of course. But I tend to simplify it down to this: political persecution and the subversion of democracy by the existing state. It is an evil ideology reserved for greedy, corrupt elites in order to preserve their position at the top of the pile. The only people who'd be happy partaking in fascism are those who do not believe that they are doing so. Enter the UAF and state-funded far-left.
A National Socialist? Nothing, strictly speaking. But the term Nazi extends beyond describing a fairly credible political ideology to encompass fascism, hatred and mass-murder. What's NOT wrong with those things? (note: I do not subscribe to National Socialist ideology).
He is referred to as a 'Holocaust Denier' because he, rather naively, still believes that freedom of speech permits us to question the details of the Holocaust atrocity. A 'Holocaust Denier' SHOULD only be used to refer to someone who believes that the Holocaust never happened. Questioning exact numbers and details does not make one a denier, monster, nor someone who isn't saddened by the thought of the mass-murder of any ethnic or religious group.
He's proven himself the bravest, most honest politican in the country. How can he be in politics for the wrong reasons if he has chosen what he would always have known is the most hated, persecuted position in British politics?
Explain please. This is one ridiculous statement that should never go unchallenged.
Last edited by Cythraul; 01-05-2010 at 09:54 AM.
"They call themselves Green because they're too yellow to admit they're Reds" - Lord Monckton
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks