Quote:
Originally Posted by Wowbanger TIP
Where is the logic in this? The BNP fail to stand a candidate in Crewe, where they had a chance, but then stand in Henley-Upon-Thames where they will be lucky to save the deposit?
I like to hear the explanation for this one. Which doesn't contradict every thing said about Crewe.
More evidence for my contention that the principle reason Crewe was shamefully ducked because it would have demanded Griffin's presence and allowed an opportunity for the extent of the damage to the Northern units of the BNP to become evident. Plus allowed the remnants to conspire against "der fuhrer".
QED?
|
Oh dont talk stupid, the reasons given for not standing in crewe were that it was too close to the may elections and that the party wouldnt of been able to put in a decent campaign. The BNP have the chance to put in a decent campaign here because it hasnt even been called yet, Nick Griffin will still go and help here as he usually goes and leafletts everywhere else. So dont know what people are trying to say by talking as if Griffin avoides going out on the streets.
Also with this election it wont have as much of a squeeze like the crewe by-election so smaller parties should do better.