Where is the logic in this? The BNP fail to stand a candidate in Crewe, where they had a chance, but then stand in Henley-Upon-Thames where they will be lucky to save the deposit?
I like to hear the explanation for this one. Which doesn't contradict every thing said about Crewe.
More evidence for my contention that the principle reason Crewe was shamefully ducked because it would have demanded Griffin's presence and allowed an opportunity for the extent of the damage to the Northern units of the BNP to become evident. Plus allowed the remnants to conspire against "der fuhrer".
QED?
|