Quote:
Originally Posted by Aardvark
I think Labour would rather lose 50 seats to the Tories than one to BNP.
The message would be clear - Labour is losing the white working class vote.
If all the blue collar workers vote Tory it could be put down to a million issues, but, no matter what, the BNP is associated with one issue - immigration.
Labour will be desperate not to be humiliated in such a fashion and Hodge is a double edged loss as a member of a senior, and incredibly wealthy, Jewish family could suggest an anti-Semitic bent.
Hodge is not now, nor ever has been, a member of the 'working classes'. She is a filthy rich champagne socialist (who trashed Islington when a council leader there) with no understanding of poverty or hardship, having experienced neither.
Labour will have to defend her with central resources as she might even lose the votes of her own local party members.
|
I agree with your first paragraph, Aardvark. The simple reason being the Libs, Cons and Labour are one and the same - they are parties that agree to adhere to the constraints imposed upon them by the social marxist ideology that now prevails. Cameron summed the situation up when he said to a chap and I am paraphrasing, "The BNP? I´d rather you voted for anybody other than them".
The truth is the BNP is
the alternative to the socially marxist elite that have infiltrated our ´mainstream´ political parties. We will not be cowed by political correctness, and thus having a voice in Parliament that could potentially awaken the electorate to this fact would be a devastating blow that they seek to block at all costs.
They need to maintain the perception that we are all ignorant thugs (before you reply Mike, I have no convictions and am a graduate from an established university) and holocaust deniers (which I am not, nor have ever been).
Their supremacy has to remain unchallenged, and all the other political parties are adherents to the ruling ideology...