View Single Post
Old 12-05-2008, 10:17 AM   #11 (permalink)
tito
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
That's a bit of a Robin Hood argument though. You could argue that robbing some rich fat ******* and giving his money to 30 families has a net benefit. It is still morally wrong though and will lead us all to hell. What is perfect anyway? I don't expect perfection, but I do expect the right to breath without choking. Actual, proveable physical harm has to be dealt with by the rule of law.
Driving a car physically harms others. So does killing a pot plant

Though the courts can and should be used for the more extreme cases.

Quote:
Then I would support suggested measures. My beef is than NONE of those issues have been proven. Indeed, there is utter ********, assumption and dismisal of debate which means it is more likely to be fascists trying to get their own way, rather than any real concern for the environment.
My beef is with the pure evil that drives environmentalists, hatred of man.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline   Reply With Quote