As I have said before Titford's recent actions were disgraceful. He accuses the likes of West, Hudson, Batten and Bannerman of self promotion and yet is quite content to promote Gulleford at every possible opportunity. Pot calling the kettle black?
I would very much like to know if Titford has been called to account for his actions. If not why not? As I have said before no other party member would have been allowed to do this. Or is he above normal party rules?
Last edited by fordtit; 12-05-2008 at 09:55 AM.
|