View Single Post
Old 11-05-2008, 08:35 PM   #32 (permalink)
Harbinger
Member
 
Harbinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 159
Party: None
Harbinger has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
What's the point of having them then, if you've already admitted that they won't stop terrorism? I thought that was your original argument.
Can you read? The answer is in my post


Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
Why do you want to track the general population?
I dont, I want the police to track terrorists, obviously you dont.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
Having a passport is a voluntary document, having an ID card is not optional. A passport also does not carry my iris scan, finger print and/or DNA.
Passport voluntary? I guess if you want to stay in th UK, if you want to leave however....

Wanting to ensure that an identity document actually identifies the person? How awful.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
From the Conservatives: ID cards won't prevent illegal immigration: Foreign visitors will not have to have an ID card, unless they plan to stay in the UK for more than three months.

From the Lib Dems:The Home Office wants to make it compulsory for people to present their card when applying for a job in the UK, and claims that this will prevent illegal working. But employers in industries with high levels of illegal labour are already required to check identity documents. The problem is that the Home Office doesn’t inspect them to make sure they are following the rules. There were only 2 prosecutions for employing an illegal worker in 2003. The fact that illegal immigrants will not be able to get ID cards will not change anything as long as there are unscrupulous employers and lax Home Office enforcement.
So tighten up law enforcement i am all for that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
I dispute the law isn't bad, but assuming for a moment that it isn't - if anything the incidents with the councils and the Terrorism Acts just goes to prove that you can't trust the "honest intentions" of the government with such powers - they'll be abused.

Paranoid rubbish

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
We already have the longest detention times in the Western world. Please tell me why 90 days is necessary.

"Liberty staff interviewed terrorism specialists and lawyers in 15 countries.

Their research found that in the U.S. the detention limit is two days, in France it is six, Italy four and in Turkey suspects can be held for 7-1/2 days.

In Spain, where 191 people died in the 2004 Madrid train bombings, there is a five-day detention limit. The closest any country comes to Britain's month-long limit is Australia with 12 days."


Britain has longest terrorism detention | UK | Reuters


UK terror detention limit is longest of any democracy | UK news | The Guardian
LOL so I am supposed to believe the lovers of criminals 'liberty'?




Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post

First off, what's wrong with legal immigrants?

Secondly, we do not need new laws to tackle the others issues you mention, we need better enforcement of existing legislation.
There are too many legal immigrants, too many east europeans too many gypsies etc etc etc.

Oh and the 7/7 bombers were all second generation legal immigrants,that enough for you?
Harbinger is offline   Reply With Quote