Bob FM: We are talking about two separate things. (1) Justification for capital movements between a UKIP Call Centre and a private limited compamy. Donated money was transferred to a private company, of which the Call Centre manager was the director. I have provided you with my source, Company House, gave you the registration number, and the amounts which A.E. Ltd agree was received by them between 2003-2005. What other facts do you want? Have you seen the evidence which justified those payments? In a democracy they call it accountability.
(2) Concerning the donations to other parties from various sources, why not contact the,
Electoral Commission.
. Trevelyan House,
Great Peter Street,
London. SW1P 2HW.
You appear certain that other political parties have been treated more favourably than UKIP, and you give various examples. Ask why decision were made, in respect of the Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dems, which to you seem unfair, compared to those decisions made in respect of UKIP. I have no doubt that they will be able to answer your questions. Is it not sufficient for a company to be registered in the United Kingdom? You say that it must actually be trading in the UK. I couldn't answer that question, I really do not know.
If, as you believe, their decisons were due to a collective malevolence, or by some highly placed individual, acting alone or in concert with others, to inflict harm on UKIP. You are perfectly at liberty to say those things. They will, however, be requesting evidence to support that allegation.
|