Quote:
Originally Posted by Besoeker
Of course not. But Booker's comment:
"We should get back to proper science"
implies that he knows that we are not engaging in "proper science".
He may have an opinion about that but he is not really in a position to state it as fact.
|
It depends how you interpret it
He may be suggesting that science need sto be viewed objectively and not used by non-scientists like Gore and the media to whip up a hysterical storm which may not be correct
As we've seen in the previous century the experts had predicted a new ice age which went tits up
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."
|