Quote:
Originally Posted by London Orbital
The 'opposition' as you put it do in fact work with Searchlight & continually rubbish senior BNP officials on far-left sites like LUAF (though I believe its called something else now). However, this doesn't really matter - & most of the membership are unaware of sites like Covert.
The membership rightly judged Nick Griffin to be the best choice in 2007 - in a relatively unsuccessful year - and they are even more likely to do so in 2008
These leadership challenges are a waste of time really, except that an ambititious coterie are determined to make greater headway in nationalism - which is quite difficult for them unless they succeed in replacing the current BNP chairman.
None of the people you mentioned are 'thugs' as you put it. A bit of negative campaigning on a website - which in any case is mirrored by the automatic Searchlight backing of any opponent to Griffin - scarcely warrants comparison with Mugabe.
|
what further proof do we need of the sham of democracy wihtin the bnp, than that griffin allows smears to be posted around both on blogs and by his weak-minded followers who repeat everything they hear like it's gospel. those are not the actions of a leader with integrity, who respects traditional British fair play. They are the actions of a thug in a suit. The leaks are still continuing - didn't know that did you? leadership challenges are a waste of time are they? yes, that's what Mugabe thinks too. not 'thugs'? (just psychologically deranged perhaps?) - have fun persuading the British public, because they know better.