Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
I have no idea what you are talking about. This isn't about left or right although you are clearly ideologically motivated, it is what is scientifically correct.
|
This isn't about left or right yet you feel the need to bring up the political leanings of a newspaper?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
Now that just made no sense.
|
It makes perfect sense. You cannot back up your "scientific" position with evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
Can I just say that this is absurd. I have the representatives of the top 13 science societies in the world.
|
You have the political heads of 13 scientific societies signing a piece of paper. You do not have ANY evidence of the position held by it's members. You have 13 - nothing more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
She is the head of the Canadian royal society, she does what most of her members want. And I seem to rememer you quoting economists.
|
So surely you can provide evidence of the scientific poll or survey done of the Canadian Royal Societies members to support her position.
Obviously I included economists since they are the experts on the economy and their opinion on what we do to the economy in relation to AGW is more important then ANY natural scientist. Ms. Demer's background is useless in the debate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
You are clearly lacking in reading ability as much as you seem to be in the logic area.
|
I am lacking what? You keep stating that my questions are answered in the Wiki page yet you cannot prove me wrong and prove that even one of my questions are answered on it. You keep lying and stating that they are because you just keep getting you ass handed to you on your lack of knowledge on how Wikipedia works.
Prove me wrong! Come on you can do it, you sure talk a lot but no action.