Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
Who even mentioned the BBC? And if you think it worse than Murdoch's newspapers you have another thing coming.
|
I mentioned it since you seem to think a liberally biased source is ok but one that actually prints the opinion of the other side in addition to the left is not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
I don't have. Can you provide me a survey showing most US marines do not have loyalty to North Korea?
|
You don't have evidence for your "scientific" position? Then that is called faith AKA religion. Your question doesn't even make any sense since "loyalty" has nothing to do with science. But I can see how someone who believes faith science would be interested in non-scientific arguments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
You have destroyed nothing but your credibility and it has been noted that you are unable to form your own arguments and just use dubious links. And nothing beats the links I had anyway.
|
I've destroyed you each time over and over. You cannot back up any of your positions. I not only explained my clear position I back it up with evidence. What links the one that is signed by 13 "scientists"? Lets see 19,000 vs. 13 .... I wonder if anyone can do the math for me.
Oh you will love this. One of your
signers appears to be the ultimate expert on global warming!
Canadian Royal Society President: Patricia Demers, Ph.D. English and French!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
Now you've gone and ****** me off, I really don't like morons who claim victory like that, particularly those who have zero substance.
By default you are proven to not have the reading comprehension to read a webpage where it is all written. Therefore all your arguments, which are very dubious anyway, should be discarded.
Everyone else note that this guy can't even read the Wiki rule page that me and Alex provided him with. I THINK HE CAN SAFELY BE IGNORED.[
|
So either answer my questions or you lose by default because you are incapable of answering them! I've read the page and NONE of my questions were answered there. Why not point it out to me and embarrass me? Prove me wrong! Come on you can do it, you sure talk a lot but no action.
Yes you would like all my facts and sources to be ignored so you can continue to spread your propaganda unchallenged!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee
I thought it was meant to be joke?
The consensus is overwhelming, the world's thirteen official science societies such as the Royal society have taken action to show this. So either try some actual arguments or go away, you are becoming very irritating to many people it seems and for little substance in return.
|
So overwhelming that all you can produce is a paper signed by 13 "scientists" one of which is...
Canadian Royal Society President: Patricia Demers, Ph.D. English and French!!! 
Yes I am becoming VERY irritating to the propagandists!