Quote:
Originally Posted by Poptech
I am sorry for using "newspapers" to report the news of the blatant liberal Bias at the BBC but the evidence is overwhelming:
BBC report finds bias within corporation ( The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Bias and the Beeb ( Financial Times, UK)
Bias at the Beeb - official ( The Times, UK)
BBC confesses bias on religion, politics ( WorldNetDaily)
BBC network admits it: We're biased toward left ( WorldNetDaily)
BBC report damns its ‘culture of bias’ ( The Times, UK)
BBC viewers angered by its 'innate liberal bias' ( The Daily Telegraph, UK)
Confessions of a BBC liberal ( The Times, UK)
Facebook reveals the BBC as a liberal hotbed ( The Daily Mail, UK)
The BBC's commitment to bias is no laughing matter ( The Daily Telegraph, UK)
The Beeb's Bias ( The Wall Street Journal)
We are biased, admit the stars of BBC News ( Daily Mail, UK)
Why saving Earth is not the BBC's job ( Daily Mail, UK) |
Who even mentioned the BBC? And if you think it worse than Murdoch's newspapers you have another thing coming.
Quote:
|
Then surely you can prove me wrong and provide me with the scientific survey of all the members that show a clear "consensus".
|
I don't have. Can you provide me a survey showing most US marines do not have loyalty to North Korea?
Quote:
|
I have destroyed all your attempts at argument with plenty of SOURCES. I realize this is shocking to those who want to promote the alarmist hysteria
|
.
You have destroyed nothing but your credibility and it has been noted that you are unable to form your own arguments and just use dubious links. And nothing beats the links I had anyway.
Quote:
|
As have both of you have noted you are unable to answer my questions and by default are proven wrong.
|
Now you've gone and ****** me off, I really don't like morons who claim victory like that, particularly those who have zero substance.
By default you are proven to not have the reading comprehension to read a webpage where it is all written. Therefore all your arguments, which are very dubious anyway, should be discarded.
Everyone else note that this guy can't even read the Wiki rule page that me and Alex provided him with. I THINK HE CAN SAFELY BE IGNORED.