Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
I believe the 'hockey stick graph' was looked at comprehensively by a US congressional committee who agreed that some of the statistical methodolgy was flawed but made so little difference that is was insignificant in the final analysis.
|
"I believe" says it all really
Quote:
|
Anticipating this, the 'Exxon' led doubters set up through sceptic congressman Barton a parallel congressional comitteee, headed by a denier stool-pigeon ( Wegman?). Nobody of significance took any notice of their report apparently since the IPCC moved wholesale to the Hockey stick, slightly corrected and have developed it on further.
|
Significance in YOUR eyes perhaps
Quote:
|
Nobody in the scientific community with any sense doubts it is the best collation & analysis of the last few hundred years (millenia actually) warming data even thought the uncertainties over proxy data are shared by everybody.
|
Nice sweeping generalisations again
It's a done deal because of people like you who dismiss any thing else without even trying to understand the facts and as for trying to reverse it well it looks like it's a good way to control the masses and make money
As ever you are incapable of rational debate and post the same tired old drivel, you're either playing devils advocate or an IDIOT which is it ?