Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
1. Discredited by serious science because they a) either have links to Exxon sourced ‘libertarian’ organisations, or parrot the propaganda of those organisations & b) they have not published their ‘research, if it is in peer-reviewed journals, c) if they have published their research in a peer-reviewed journal it has subsequently be debunked and d) They have expertise in a subject that is unrelated to Climatology. Some obviously fall into several categories :-
Khabibullo Abdusamatov, Ph.D. Astrophysicist
Luboš Motl, Ph.D. Theoretical Physics
Robert (Bob) M. Carter, B.Sc. Geology, Ph.D. Paleontology
R. Timothy (Tim) Patterson, B.Sc. Biology, Ph.D. Professor of Geology
Nir J. Shaviv, Ph.D. Astrophysicist
Lin Zhen-Shan and Sun Xian of the Nanjing Normal University in China
Henrik Svensmark, Director of the Center for Sun-Climate Research, Danish Anthony Watts, Meteorologist
Dennis T. Avery, M.S. Agricultural Economics
Philip K. Chapman, B.S. Physics and Mathematics, M.S. Aeronautics and Astronautics, Ph.D. Instrumentation
|
Now you are a liar. Now please prove they have links to Exxon without using an alarmist propaganda site. Almost everyone has published real scientific research in a Peer-Review Journal and having someone at RealClimate make a statement against this does not mean it has been debunked. In relation to this topic of Global Cooling there is clear Peer-Reviewed papers supporting the position of global cooling:
Multi-scale analysis of global temperature changes and trend of a drop in temperature in the next 20 years
(Springer Wien, Volume 95, January, 2007)
- Lin Zhen-Shan, Sun Xian
New Little Ice Age Instead of Global Warming?
(Energy & Environment, Volume 14, Numbers 2-3, pp. 327-350, 1 May 2003)
- Landscheidt T.
Your paper on the the other hand has NOT been Peer-Reviewed and thus the evidence I have presented is the same. But Peer-Review does not mean truth, perhaps you can learn more about this here:
Peer Review, Publication in Top Journals, Scientific Consensus, and So Forth (
Robert Higgs, Ph.D. Economics)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
For independent proof of their discredibility, google their names, or go to Wiki, or go to the logical science link I’ve given elsewhere.
|
I have thoroughly discredited Wikipedia:
The Faith-Based Encyclopedia (
Robert McHenry, Former Editor in Chief, the Encyclopedia Britannica)
Wikipedia's Zealots (
National Post, Canada)
-
The real climate Martians (
Financial Post, Canada)
A false Wikipedia 'biography' (
USA Today)
A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source (
The New York Times)
Wikipedia "broken beyond repair", co-founder says (
The Inquirer)
Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems (
The Register)
Wikipedia - I have the power (
Penny Arcade)
Your other site alarmist propaganda: "logical science".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
2. Proof required ( a specific statement against AGW representative of the whole organisation)
|
This debate is about Global Cooling! Did you think people would not notice you trying to change the subject?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
...in respect of the Goddard Space centre, you do realise that the director is James Hansen
|
Again you lie. The Director of the Nasa Goddard Space Center is
Dr. Edward J. Weiler.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
Now, I am fed up with your continued trolling of this quite fraudulent ‘evidence’ and will not respond to any further post unless you can specify the source & exact original statements.
|
I am quite tired of you blatant lies spoken over and over and you pathetic attempt to define an argument for proganda purposes.