British Democracy Forum - View Single Post

ANGLO-STAFFS · 29-04-2008, 09:08 AM

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/Campaign_News_As_he_battles_to_become_London's_may or,_the_bizarre_truth_about_the_BNP_boss_...-ref954

An article from the Searchlight site but a Daily Mail story.

Searchlight and the media seem to have given up trying to stop the BNP from getting a seat so they are turning their guns elsewhere. I couldn't care less that they try to tear Barnbrook apart; he has put himself in the firing line. But in the above story the Mail "reveals" that Barnbrook was married to a Met' police officer.
They point out that they are not allowed to give her name because of her job, but then say where and when they were married and that she has reverted to her maiden name. Even a searchlight researcher could find out her name from this. (Couldn’t you Bulter).
I think that this is a totally disgusting abuse of media responsibilities. This woman could now be a target for any sicko who thinks it is an easy way to get at the BNP.

In the article much is made of Barnbrook never mentioning her. Well maybe, just maybe, he has a slight sense of decency and did not want to drag her into possible danger.

29-04-2008, 09:08 AM	#1 (permalink)
ANGLO-STAFFS Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 556	I Will Post This Before Bulter Does http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/Campaign_News_As_he_battles_to_become_London's_may or,_the_bizarre_truth_about_the_BNP_boss_...-ref954 An article from the Searchlight site but a Daily Mail story. Searchlight and the media seem to have given up trying to stop the BNP from getting a seat so they are turning their guns elsewhere. I couldn't care less that they try to tear Barnbrook apart; he has put himself in the firing line. But in the above story the Mail "reveals" that Barnbrook was married to a Met' police officer. They point out that they are not allowed to give her name because of her job, but then say where and when they were married and that she has reverted to her maiden name. Even a searchlight researcher could find out her name from this. (Couldn’t you Bulter). I think that this is a totally disgusting abuse of media responsibilities. This woman could now be a target for any sicko who thinks it is an easy way to get at the BNP. In the article much is made of Barnbrook never mentioning her. Well maybe, just maybe, he has a slight sense of decency and did not want to drag her into possible danger.