This article has been severely panned in Deltoid :-
Deltoid
Quote:
The Australian wasn't content to publish Phil Chapman's silly ice-age article, but also published a news story that treated it like a legitimate scientific paper. Now, instead of publishing a correction to Chapman's falsehoods from a climate scientist they have an article by Christopher Pearson. Even though it was the Australian which published Chapman's piece a few days earlier, almost half of Pearson's article was a quote or paraphrase of Chapman.
Pearson also gives the view of climate science you get from the Australian's bunker:
read on
|
and as you might expect it has spawned a rash of sceptics circulating it and claiming AGW is dead.
Believe this article & you (generalised) need medical treatment
Hint: Click the 'silly ice-age article' link in the quote and see what comments posters make of it