Furthermore, George, I would suggest you read the summaries of many of the quoted papers and try to understand exactly what the researchers are claiming - which may be very subtely different to the II claims.
I see from the early papers that 'Millenial scale' warming (& cooling) episodes are identified from ice core analysis - but bear in mind our current warming phase is believed by most of the researchers who have actually made the measurements to be 'decadal'. You understand the difference I presume.
And I see the hoary old 'CO2 lag' argument, so favoured by TTGWS, is quoted.
You've been hornswoggled
