Originally Posted by The Bear

Now there’s a archetypical response that one might expect from a person who sees only a physical aspect to attack and who tries to use the “halo” approach as a form of defense.

So as to be perfectly clear about this, no I am not advocating attacking BNP supporters, and as for the address of some poor old boy who was obviously a hero in his day, no I don’t want his address. Nor should you be offering it. He should, if he even exists and is other than a hypothetical token to emphasise and so seek to gain sympathy for your viewpoint, not only be left to his own devices but should not be exploited by being brought into this.

What I am advocating is attacking the foul ideology that is at the heart of the BNP.

There. That’s not too hard to understand is it? You see the word “attack” has many meanings, many of which you are probably totally unaware.

Maybe it may also come as a surprise that not everybody thinks along the same track as you do?

As for the “UAF”, believe it or not I actually had to undertake a web search to find out what it even is let alone that I might be a member of it (which I most certainly am not)

In fact a person doesn’t need to be a member of anything beyond decent humanity to deplore what is at the black heart of the BNP.