Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall
Please explain in your usual succinct manner with a touch of brevity
|
I assume you want me to explain why I think it is a flawed article?
A couple of points:
Quote:
|
The report's most startling passage, however, is one that examines the "fingerprint" of warming at different levels of the atmosphere which the computer models come up with as proof that the warming is man-made.
|
Not even the IPCC is claiming proof.
Quote:
|
One of the central flaws in the IPCC's case is its reliance on computer models, based only on those parts of the evidence which suit its chosen "narrative", omitting or downplaying hugely important factors which might produce a very different picture. These range from the role played by water vapour, by far the most important of the greenhouse gases, to the influence of solar activity on cloud cover.
|
Water vapour is addressed on pages 236, 238, 254, 261, 271......
Solar radiation on 272, 278, 280, 317, ............
Just to cite a few examples.