View Single Post
Old 12-04-2008, 08:08 AM   #7 (permalink)
The Bear
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,067
The Bear is just starting out
Default

Quote]

”So for me to get proper dental treatment I should become one of them? Instead of being stuck on a waiting list of which I have no idea how long it will take and no-one wants to answer my questions at the building regarding it?”

Looks like it.

But this is 100% down to New Labour maladministration.

Quote

”Hang on Bear, why should I be forking out for foreigners to get free healthcare?”

In the case of those seeking what used to be called Political Asylum but was changed to Asylum by Blair and Co. the convention that all nations have signed up to provides people granted asylum or who are being considered asylum certain rights including health care as appropriate.

Where it has gone terribly wrong is the failure to stick to the “first safe country” provisions and the failure to get those not meeting the definition of political refugees expelled from Britain, again down to New Labour and their quest for votes in marginal and usually predominantly immigrant constituencies.

Quote]

”In my opinion, if you're not a UK citizen (or here legally to work/asylum) you should have to pay for treatment. That should include tourists too.”

The easy one first, Tourists DO have to pay for other than emergency medical treatment.

In theory.

Often the hospitals and GP’s simply don’t bother to press for payment as the hassle is more than it’s worth for them.

For those who have been refused asylum and who await deportation then what do you do? Let them die for want of treatment?

Where there IS an issue is the number who have turned up and who have managed to bamboozle their way through the asylum process who are really here for our health service.

It should come as no surprise that the recently reported huge increase in reported HIV/ AIDS infections are as a result of immigrants coming here already infected.

Quote

”Since when was is it not possible to return an asylum seeker? If they got out, then they can be put back. All other considerations are an irrelevance.”

Mostly since Blair signed us up to the ECHR. That along with other “conventions” prohibit the return of a person to a country in which his “human rights” would be at risk.

Quote

”More importantly, they should be in the first safe country they crossed to get here (Britain is an island is it not , and it is, is it not, surrounded and separated by the sea by Germany, France, Irish Republic, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal, from the rest or the world) so it is they who should be providing them with health care, etc, not the people of this island.

If an “asylum seeker” can be shown to have passed through a safe country or European state in order to reach Britain in my opinion, and in law, he should be returned to the last safe nation or state that he traversed or to the first if that can be established.

But for some bizarre reason Britain under New Labour decide not to do so.

Quote]

”The word "asylum" is the most screwed-up political definition to date. 'Last night, critics warned the bill for the care could be the "straw that broke the back'" of an NHS struggling to cope with demand from British citizens.'

More like the straw that broke the back of the Labour government.”


I absolutely agree that the corruption of the meaning and interpretation of the word “asylum” is terrible and wrong.

The whole sorry mess can be laid at the door of New Labour.
The Bear is offline   Reply With Quote