Quote:
|
It is derived from a natural right and I completely disagree with your assertion that there are no natural rights (or natural right).
|
There is no proof for these rights, they are nothing more than an assertion and of a very dubious character. Where do these rights come from? What do they look like? Why do they seem to be habitually broken? How are they applied?
This is far from the first time I've had this discussion and I've never had a decent answer. In the end rights are little more than social contructs.
Quote:
|
Furthermore, I don't see what saying there are many outlooks on property has to do with anything. There are many outlooks on any political issue - take yourself for example. There are many people who disagree with regionalisation and decentralisation, does this make that political philosophy false? Of course not.
|
Decentralism is a fluid and pragmiatic idea. It does not presmue to derive an exact formula for the state from a few dubious axioms as much natural rights property theory does.