View Single Post
Old 27-03-2008, 10:53 PM   #18 (permalink)
tito
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron von Lotsov View Post
Well I suppose I have been slightly aware of charities and their political programmes for a long time and so I have been on the look out to see what their game is. Some seem to genuinely do some very good work and I have never seen anything remotely dodgy about the RSPCA despite knowing a fair bit through people around me having contact with them. The NSPCC I don't know a lot about but I would probably check it on account of the fact it deals with children and this is some area where a lot of trust is required, since it is so easy to brainwash children for political reasons and especially ones in troubled circumstances. Again I draw a blank with the British Heart Foundation but I'm not overly familiar with them.

On the other hand a charity that I view as highly suspicious is the Red Cross. They have shown their credentials on numerous occasions and the issue here is that they were trying their hardest to ban Christmas. Now this is very out of order and it went down like a lead balloon, so why on earth did they do that? Maybe it has something to do with the Communists who tried to stamp out religion since in Communism there is only one thing to worship and that is the state. The state replaces both the family and the church. There have been other serious issues with this charity as well in that it has been said that they have acted as spies for the military, since they claim neutrality in wars it's the perfect cover.
The NSPCC spends so much money on political campaigning. Remember the drive to ban smacking your own children? Look no further.

The RSPCA, similarly, might as well declare itself a political party!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline   Reply With Quote