Forget about whether we have a constitution or
not - we have one.
The point of this thread is the Bill of Rights and its employment.
The government are referring to it for their purposes, yet when the public try to wheel it out to protect their ancient rights, the government tries to ignore it.
The whole purpose of the law is to make it simple for the public to understand and use. When people like you, gremlin, come along and support the concept that we do not have a constitution, you are aiding and abetting the forces of tyrrany.
We have a problem with laws since 1972 in that the legitimacy of Britain's membership of the EU is now being openly questioned - that is serious, as when people talk of the rule of law, the response will be: whose law are we talking about?
We do however have our constitution, whether you call it codified uncodified or whatever and that should be a comfort to all freedom loving peoples.
|