Star: I understand what you are saying, but have you any idea of his actual status? If he is still a UKIP MEP, why is that not acknowleged on the party website? He at least should be afforded the presumption of innocence, until/unlessl he is convicted or acquitted. Will he be attending the Eastern Regional conference? If he is permitted to work as a UKIP MEP and accept speaking engagements, can he really be debarred from his own Regional Conference? The facts or truth of allegations concerning fraud, will be decided in the future in another place. Legal-fictions, made on the hoof, merely hold us up to ridicule. What we can say for certain, is that he's (1) a Party member. (2) an MEP. If he is a UKIP MEP, but not a UKIP/IDG MEP, that should not debar him from recognition on the UKIP website. Should that not be the case, even in the UK, the IDG membership takes precedent over UKIP status. What kind of irrational reasoning is consuming us all?
|