Quote:
Originally Posted by George
Thanks for that, but I have to say I disagree with you. I don't think Ranter deserves any censure, you just need to see post 6 in this thread to see that he has a good character. Sure we don't agree but I don't think he has been abusive at all, certainly not that I recall. The same goes for Steve Fowler.
What I do think is out of order is conducting a debate by simply claiming that the other person is making up details about their personal situation, ignoring the actual debate and then refusing to withdraw these remarks when proved wrong. Even so, I don't think it should be grounds for a ban because it is far better to allow them to continue making themselves look foolish and petty.
|
Ranters comment to you:
Ranter: George I dont know or care what your agenda is but you are barking (mad) up the wrong tree ...........You have the distinction of being the first person I am going to blank., You are the saddest of the sad ,a numpty puppet who knows nothing of life ,the people of England or who won the last Ryder cup.
I will admit that Steve Fowlers were more comical rather than abusive, sorry Steve:
Steve Fowler: EU immigration should be encouraged!!! you've lost the ******* plot.
This is the funny one:
Steve Fowler: Plus Britannist always backs up his facts on any information that we get.
There is no need for Brittanist's posts to be recorded here as the thread would reach 40 pages.
As far as I can see you posted figures and explained where you got them from. When you asked Brittanist to back up his figures he got all defensive when there wasn't really any need. It's almost like Brittanist feels he should not have to, and his word is gospel.
__________________
"Then they pull down their filthy trousers, squat over a massive, subsidised ditch and evacuate their corrupt, socialist bowels all over a photograph of Shakespeare."
Last edited by Cleopatra; 07-03-2008 at 09:35 AM.
|