Quote:
Originally Posted by Britannist
Not from me.
|
What a pity. I had hoped you would prove yourself an honest man. Still, you can't say I didn't give you the opportunity.
Quote:
|
You are not providing an accurate reflection of the reasons why you were banned; nor other facts around it. As MKP Davies asked you in posting number two to this thread "Is that the whole truth?"
|
As far as I was aware at that time, that was the reason. It was the only thing which was
brought to my attention. However, I have been told since that it is possible to be banned for using the "L" word when describing someone who has been disingenious with the truth.
Quote:
|
You wrote in the first posting to this thread:
|
That was my understanding at the time. It makes more sense to me that quoting someone out of context leads to a ban that it does to ban someone for using the "L" word when untruths have been uttered about me.
Quote:
|
You were banned for using the word liar against me TEN TIMES in about three hours. I was aware within minutes of the first time you used that word but refrained from making any reply to you. You then proceed to using it a further nine times while I continued remain silent.
|
As I have made clear, I now understand the "L" word is banned. However, what you said about me was not true.
Quote:
|
As Eurosceptic Atlanticist wrote earlier in this thread, you also started using in the signature section of your postings part of a quote of my words in which you deliberately removed from your quote of me some words which resulted in the meaning of my worlds being distorted to many readers.
|
Hands up, I did indeed do that. As I said in the first post:
"I would like to offer a sincere and wholehearted apology to Brittanist for any offence caused."
Actually, you are right. I did not actually apologise in the PM, but rather I stated that I would be apologising publicly:
"I will be apologising publicly in the new thread for any offence caused." Which I did:
"I would like to offer a sincere and wholehearted apology to Brittanist for any offence caused."
Quote:
Where is the apology to me for calling me a liar TEN TIMES in about two hours across two threads.
I was not lying.
|
You have suggested that I am lying about living in Poland.
Here. Here. Here. Here. Here. Here. Here.
Here. Here. Here. Here.This is not true.
You have suggested that I am not British.
Here. Here. Here. This is not true.
You have suggested that I am untruthful.
Here. Here. Here. This is not true.
Seventeen posts where you have suggested that my statements are untrue. Given that I scanned my passport and you now have proof of the location of my IP address I would expect you to apologise or at the very least withdraw these statements.
Quote:
|
Usage of the word "liar" in reference to another poster on this forum is prohibited. I have never ever used that word against another poster here.
|
No, you know the rules. Instead you have implied the very same thing in a sneaky underhand way. I may have broken the rules, but at least I am honest enough to say straight out what I mean and apologise if I have done wrong.
Quote:
|
By the way, I do not recall quite specifically and categorically saying that you were definitely not posting from Poland.
|
No, you simply insinuated that I was not telling the truth.
Quote:
|
I would think that the best thing you could do, George, is now just 'move on' from the matter of you not being allowed to post here for a month.
|
I think the best thing I could do is defend my reputation from unworthy attacks. And the best thing you could have done would have been to enter this thread only to say:
"Well it seems George was telling the truth, sorry if I implied otherwise". Everyone now knows where I am, is it really too much for you to type that simple sentence?