Quote:
Originally Posted by C_steam
F*** me. I didn't realise it that it was not muslim terrorists who caused 9/11. Best I nip out quick to the kebab houses of the locality and apologise to all and sundry - particularly the ones with the rather inflammatory literature on show which talk about 'kill the infidels'. I'll also post a few anti-prophet cartoons, since I now realise these muslim fundamentalists are really nice chaps who appreciate a laugh and a joke.
I might even goose the next burqa clad lady who walks past. That'll have 'em rolling in the aisles of the local mosques, I'm sure.
|
All I say is what I've stated before in this thread:
The point is as I see it, is that it has been proved by expert scientists and pilots that the official explanation of a plane hitting the pentagon is impossible.
pilotsfor911truth.org
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
The issue is not about anyone (including myself) putting forward their theory as to what happened to explain the events.
It is a case of providing sufficient evidence to prove or disprove the official explanation (which includes a boeing 757 hitting the pentagon)
Just considering the penatgon alone, then the official explanation that a boeing hit the pentagon has been disproved, not to mention the rest of the inconsistencies in the story.
That is why there should be an independent investigation(apart from all the other mass of evidence that exists) is absolutely vital.
But let's be clear - no hijacker, muslim or otherwise, flew into the pentagon.
Yes it may "sound" crazy but the proof is all there - no doubt about that.
All I'd say C_steam is that when I found out, I found it very difficult to admit I was wrong too. I was in denial for a long long time.
Your remark - "the ones with the rather inflammatory literature on show which talk about 'kill the infidels'"
May I ask you - are you referring to what you see on television ?
Yes there are some extremists, but if one looks into it they start to understand who is supporting them, and why we're seeing them flashing them up on the television screen at every opportunity. But does it accurately reflect the real world ?
I know you probably won't appreciate these comments but ever wondered what the real political motive for the "war on terror" is ?
To protect us ? But statistically you've got more a lot more chance of dying in a car accident than dying from terrorism...
And why do we have to give up our "liberties" in the name of "freedom" ?
Do you know that the US neo-con think tank in 2000 said in their report "Project for the New American Century" - "Rebuilding America's defences":
"Further, the process of transformation,even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf (pg63)
But I honestly don't expect you to believe me - maybe just look into it - have you watched "Loose change" on youtube for example ?
If you think it's a lot of b**lshit once you've seen it, then fair enough.
I promise I'm not trying to get your back up at all.
I'm just trying to get people to look into it for themselves because we're all being played like a fiddle by the mainstream media.