Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk
You always have a snide little answer to everything don't you, Mark? Actually, I doubt you know what you are talking about, which would be nothing new.
This article is indeed defamatory. Let's hope it's not true.
I would hope that Nigel is now consulting his solicitors with a view to issuing proceedings if an early retraction and apology is not forthcoming.
|
Perhaps MC doesn't actually know the difference between truth and untruths. He may see 'truth' as being a statement you like and 'untruths' as ones you don't .