youcanhandlethetruth

Exactly WHO are these people that "detest women", "believe you can have no government" and are "returning to the dark ages" ?

Forgive me Aardvark, but if certain un-named parties are to be accused of various accusations, then the person making the
accusations should state clearly what and who is causing the supposed offence.(haven't other moderators stated this ?)

When people are at least specific and make up stories about me, at least I can defend myself by knowing what they are
referring to, and decide to defend myself if I choose to.

What is worse is the insinuation that is being put alongside "aggressive" words and other unrealted historical events in an
attempt to slur the name of the so called "truth" movement that no-one here to my knowledge has admitted to being part of.
Many people on this forum are searching for truth but it does not mean they are part of any group or organization.

With Frith associating the fact that (s)he has been a victim, whilst pointing to these aggresive statements, Frith is
insinuating that "we" are the one's guilty of the aggression to start off with !
Nothing could be further from the truth.

Aardvark, you talk about "walk away from reasoned argument" but since when was Frith's post "reasoned" argument to begin with ?

Sure it "sounds" reasonable but is (s)he being specific in his/her accusations and backing it up with evidence, or is (s)he painting a torrid tale of unreasonable victimisation without supporting evidence ?

You say "form of sympathy for the theories supporting the concept of MMGW." but I did not mention MMGW once in my reply, so
forgive me, but I don't believe that is reasoned argument at all.

If you can point out to me what statements of Frith's post you think are reasonable, then we can discuss them reasonably.

This ridiculous fairy tale is no more than subtle mind bending - Frith is claiming she is the victim, when actually there are
numerous references to aggression in his/her post. The intention is to put doubt in the mind's of others as to the true
intentions of the people that it tries to discredit, and I'm afraid to say, you have just proved my entire point.

Personally I'm disgusted by this type of behaviour(Frith I mean) and slightly disappointed you seem to have been fooled by
this technique.
Not that I blame you however - it's not very suprising as people only tend to read the last statement of any post and draw
their conclusions on that basis.

The whole point of posting it as a new thread was not to personally attack someone(as others would have you believe) but to
point out that people are indirectly trying to abuse other people's credibility on purpose, for their own gain.

I believe I understand how these people's tactics work to push their own agendas, and they work tirelessly to try to win
favour of unsuspecting people like yourself Aardvark.

In my opinion, most people would reason it is a complete load of bull, and I believe they would be right.

As for Besoker,Akria and Clippo - the only statements they make are those which intentionally intend to discredit people and
the well meaning conclusions that they draw from logical reasoning.

They constantly dismiss and disprove each and every subject thread, whilst they acting like they are the saviours and
innocent victims, but more importantly they almost never seem to put forward a positive argument for anything constructive or
useful at all.

A good example of this is the supposed "scientific method" that they state, which is only used to disprove why other
people/anybody elses theory is wrong, but never proves why other people/anything else is right.
As other people are fully aware, this is the theme that is constantly in all their posts.

So in this way THEY are the people who are guilty of causing friction on this forum by their constant intention to antagonize
people and reasonable debate.

Of course, they will always tell you that you are wrong (unless they are talking to each other), but that is the sad tactic
of a bunch of half wits who are no more capable of forming a scientific argument, than I am at walking on eggshells.

I am sorry if I have stooped to their level, but that is my true belief.
If you think I am wrong about my beleif or my right to state my belief, then that is up to you.

I honestly don't mean any offence to you at all Aardvark, but I suggest you read some of their posts and see if you can pick
up on the common theme most other people on this forum have already identified.

Maybe then you can see for yourself where(I believe), the ideas which are similar in nature to where the real rise of
"political correctness" in this country is stemming from.