Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk
This was such a vast and traumatic conflagration it's hardly surprising if there is some confusion between the various accounts. Clearly Silverstein and the Fire Chief weren't in 7 WTC. It's probably used as a reference point for the area where they were, and its not 100% clear whether Silverstein was on the spot. I would think he was probably talking to the Fire Chief on the phone.
I don't suppose the quoted 'spokesperson' was anywhere near 7 WTC on the day, ao I don't see any significance in these discrepancies. The actual statement given by a fireman on the spot states that he was in a different building that was threatened by the collapse of 7 WTC.
The reasons for 'pulling' the firefighters out of the danger area are obvious.
Now tell me why Silverstein and his supposed conspirators (Fire Dept., CIA, Police Dept. George W Bush etc. etc. etc.) might want to demolish the building at that stage. What would be the point - sinister or otherwise - of the supposed order to 'pull' the building?
Are you suggesting that this was the biggest insurance scam in world history?
|
Sure of course I accept that neither Silverstein, nor his spokesperson were there on the day.
Claim: Silverstein Warned Not To Come To Work On 9/11
But there are still discrepancies from him and the
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition Homepage website as to their accounts of what happened and the reasons why WTC7 fell at all....
You ask me:
"Are you suggesting that this was the biggest insurance scam in world history?"
All I would say is that you read this article and note where it says:
"In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone resulted in a profit of about $500 million.
Since then a total of nine insurance companies have continued to pay Silverstein as the legal wrangle continues. The only ones who have resisted in any way have been Allianz."
Is There A Secret To The 9/11 Insurance Battle?
Please note I am not saying the purpose of 9/11 was for an insurance scam.
I am saying that it was merely part of the criminal event, along with the insider trading that took place before Sept 11 (see 40 top reasons link), and of course, the tragic deaths of all those innocent people.