This was such a vast and traumatic conflagration it's hardly surprising if there is some confusion between the various accounts. Clearly Silverstein and the Fire Chief weren't in 7 WTC. It's probably used as a reference point for the area where they were, and its not 100% clear whether Silverstein was on the spot. I would think he was probably talking to the Fire Chief on the phone.
I don't suppose the quoted 'spokesperson' was anywhere near 7 WTC on the day, ao I don't see any significance in these discrepancies. The actual statement given by a fireman on the spot states that he was in a different building that was threatened by the collapse of 7 WTC.
The reasons for 'pulling' the firefighters out of the danger area are obvious.
Now tell me why Silverstein and his supposed conspirators (Fire Dept., CIA, Police Dept. George W Bush etc. etc. etc.) might want to demolish the building at that stage. What would be the point - sinister or otherwise - of the supposed order to 'pull' the building?
Are you suggesting that this was the biggest insurance scam in world history?
|