Quote:
Originally Posted by Aardvark
The question is are those who support the conspiracy theory people who have never subscribed to a conspiracy theory before and who have been presented, for the first time, with incontrovertible evidence or are they conspiracy theorists who are working backwards from the assumption that they have discovered yet another conspiracy and now have to provide the evidence to support it?
Just a thought. Look at the names of those who support the theory - Shayler, Moore, Sheen, Alex Jones. All have identified conspiracies in the past and will go on identifying conspiracies in the future. Are they all credible all of the time?
|
That's a false argument but a good one that the establishment and mainstream media like to use.
Alex Jones is credible most of the time becasue he presents evidence to support his claims not theories.
Look at it this way - before I examined the evidence on 911 I thought everything in the world was huky dory and that society, government were essentially good.
But when you look into the hard facts about 911 you are shown other evidence which reveals it's only the tip of the iceberg and how shocking things are but also how real knowledge is never put in the public domain.
Anyone who cares about the truth and isn't willing to make up their own "conspiracy theory" about the "conspiracy theorists" can't ignor it.
Ask yourself, who invented the term conspiracy theory and why ?
Why did Bush say "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories" ?
Because he knows they are mostly all true and they're frightened of the people finding out.
I can't believe anyone with half a brain can't work it out.
So yes they murdered kennedy, diana, did oklahoma, 911, 7/7 almost everything except the moon landings (which are always thrown in to make the truth movement appear as wackos and uncredible)
It's like saying a mass murderer wouldn't kill more than one person and the chance of that happening are impossible - wrong !
How about looking into the claims, even if to disprove they're false ? (which of course you'll quickly find out they're not)
So please no more "conspiracy theories" - if you're not willing to look at the evidence that is in front of you, then you probably don't deserve to have an opinion on the subject.