Rjt wrote:-
Quote:
|
Sometimes one honestly wishes you would not, there is a wide ranging debate to be had in this country and people in authority who think like you seem to wish to stiffle it. One wonders what you purpose is on this forum.
|
You keep saying things like this rjt and it only reflects badly on the credibility of your opinions and your paranoia about not being able to accept truths from other people. It is you who wish to stifle open discussion.
I am completely in favour of a wide ranging debate. Where you, (and your small band of deluded associates), and I differ, is that the scientific debate over GW and the causes of the current phase of global warming is basically over. For the consensus of scientists, the consensus of religious leaders, the consensus of world politicians and most surveys suggest the consensus of the world population, the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour that there is GW and it is mostly caused by mankind’s activities.
So, my opinion is that the debate should be about what mankind needs to do to reverse the situation.
I repeat again that I’m am anti-EU, mostly on the point that British laws and taxes should be generated from our own Westminster parliament. However, I am not against detailed co-operation with any country, but particularly the European ones individually or as ‘groups’, to harmonise all sorts of aspects of our national systems.