Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey
I find it interesting how the 'two way movement' in libertarian politics is not a bad one. Whether you are a moral libertarian (Rand, Nozick) or a utilitarian libertarian (Hayek, Friedman), the result is still the same. I don't really know of a bad libertarian political philosophy. 
|
Prehaps Libertarianism is not a 'two-way' movement like Nationalism as in determining what makes it right or wrong, but Libertarianism a 'two-way movement' because it has a compass, two oppisate ends. If you see what I mean.
Nationalism a two-way thing because it can be coined good or bad depending on how it is used. Whereas Libertarianism is a two-way thing not because it can be good or bad but because it has two opposing ideals, but are both good. Get me?
