Quote:
Originally Posted by Clippo
youcanhandlethetruth,
Your wild incomprehensible rants have no place in a sensible forum like this. Amongst tons of garbage you have written, I found this:-
Well, let me tell you that far cleverer people than you have developed this argument the other way around - how to deal with a GW denier. There are many such websites offering this.
See for example :-
RC Wiki - RCwiki
and from one :-
Gristmill: The environmental news blog | Grist
Just look at section C where I found this :-
'Global warming is a hoax' | Gristmill: The environmental news blog | Grist
So, according to you, those national & international august organisations, covering thousand upon thousands of member scientists, are all misled by the world dominating elite.
What a dork!.
I’ve had enough of your drivel – I will not respond to you on this matter any further. |
I thought you were going to say "Holocaust denier" for a second there !
Well you can mock me and call me as many names as much as you like - it shows you're losing the argument.
The fact that you have included Wikipedia in your list of hitpieces(there are many disinfo agents of the web), discredits your refutation:
Of course there are a number of truthful entries on Wiki, but unfortunately a significant number of hitpieces and editing of articles containing real information:
FBI, CIA Scriveners Edit Wikipedia Entries
Companies and party aides cast censorious eye over Wikipedia
Time To Fight Back Against Online Disinfo Agents and Trolls
Your articles you present are nothing more than "hitpieces" used to discredit "conspiracy theories" by internet disinformation agents.
It works along the lines of, if you can't disprove something using fact, then try to discredit it using ridicule........
As for your other point, these scientists are not misled at all - many have it in their own interests to profit from the funding they receive - we all know global warming is big big business.
Like the EU, the gravy train of global warming is too good an opportunity to miss out on !
Maybe some of them may actually believe in what they are doing, though equally there are a number of scientists who don't agree with "man made" global warming.
The IPCC report included scientists against their own wishes to gain an fake "concensus".
In short - there is no consensus, even though the mainstream media including Al Gore and co, lie and say there is.....
I don't mind if you want to respond to me or not - that's up to you...
Though most people would just not respond, not say they are not going to respond.