Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stathan
No.
In fact I almost puked up over the pitiful terminology used in your post.
|
Stathan
I think your above post says quite a lot about you.
Turning away from Stathan, and to develop the argument about Unionist politics being corrupt, let me make some further points about the 5 largest unionist political parties in the UK:
Re Tories, Lib Dem and Labour
All hide the truth about the EU
All have major irregularities about their funding (cash for peerages etc)
All have worked to deny England fair treatment
All for party political reasons have policies that favour the other home nations at the expense of England
All are led by professional politicians who are light on real beliefs
All have more than their fair share of crooks (Archer, Aitkin) and shysters (Blair, Prescott)
All lie about the scale and effects of uncontrolled immigration.
All are guided by focus groups, and aim for the centre ground
Re UKIP
The Roger Knapman accusations seem well founded
UKIP MEPs when they get to Brussels seem to go native
The party has had too many financial irregularities
Too much in-fighting at the expense of fighting the EU.
Re BNP
I assume that I do not need to comment.
In summary
Interesting that none of the above parties speak for England. None seem a care a fig for the English nation.
Although all five of the Unionist parties have some poor/bad aspects, I accept that UKIP are the best of the five. But, overall, these unionist parties do not provide much of a choice for the electorate. I think the people of England deserve much better representation - don't you?
Andrew Constantine