Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Niall Warry
Tito said:-
Right; finally. A positive suggestion.
You believe our MEPs should stay in the UK? On some levels I agree.
However, the majority of the party does not want this.
I personally think the odd parliamentary criticism does far more for gathering UKIP support than to have them knocking on doors.
You haven't been paying atention Tito as I've come up with a number of ideas over the months :x
The main reason our MEP's go to Brussels seems to be to collect their allowances. :evil:
Where on earth do you get the statistic that the majority of the party want them to go to Brussels :?: :?: :?: :?:
Finally while they should knock on a few doors at the relevant times who said that is all they should do. :?:
I want to strengthen UKIP and make it more likely to achieve its aim of get the UK to leave the EU.
I assume you agree with that. Where we apparantly disagree is as to whether our MEPs are going a good job. I say they are performing very badly and have to all intense and purposes gone native. :evil:
|
With special regard to your recent "honeytrap" article you are certainly not strengthening us. If you want to change the leader and tactics, democratically, that is one thing. But it is entirely another when you damage us like this.
Surely, you can see that what you do does not gather support and members. Instead it drives a wedge through the community and scares people off.
Should you choose to seek democratic reform I would support you; we certainly need to change how we are run.
I suggest, instead, you use what little time remaining to influence the vote of others in the NEC election. That would be a start. (The ballot papers turned up today, by the way)
I, personally, voted for
Chris Mounsey
Toby Micklethwait
Geoffrey Kingscot
Steven Povey.