Once again MPKDavies, when he can’t accept a piece of evidence challenging his obtuse views goes stamping around shouting voodoo (you’ve left out witchcraft this time by the way) and shooting the messenger (this time the
internationally respected New Scientist).
Your responses to anything truly ‘scientific’ in the GW debate are absolutely laughable. All you can do is bluster & huff & puff. This latest evidence, painstakingly gathered by real scientists, in the real world & not in the pay of US big business, is very inconvenient for you . You would have done better not to comment on it rather than expose yourself to ridicule again & again
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet, yet again JP comes up with a comment on this work from a very dubious website. I see that is USA based and is heavily into ‘Free Markets’. Do I have to say more!!!
These interpretations of the Hockey-stick data in this website are
NOT the ones made by the scientists who actually carried out the work. The site is littered with snide quotations biased to make serious scientists look unreliable including the 25years work of the University of East Anglia. But of course the Prof. Jones led mammoth scientific study( again of international scientific repute & admiration). doesn't suite this 'TCSdaily's preconceptions or real motives.
In the Hurricanes thread you say:-
Quote:
|
I was the commercial director for an FTSE 100 firm so I certainly understand the economic arguments
|
Would that be a company having extensive interests in ‘energy’ or transport ?
You’re either being led up the garden path by your penchant for visiting only these openly anti-GW sites or you are trying to lead others up the path for, presumably, your own self-interest.
Now – answer my question:-
Do you believe that, as you wrote in the Hurricanes thread:-
Quote:
|
The temperature hasn't increased since 1998.
|