Drip drip drip is bad bad bad. In his short quote (doubtless wrenched from a context), Nigel seems to be saying that either the party was misled or it misunderstood. I'm unclear which.
The source for the report seems to be in (or very close to) the Payments Office. I wonder who / why?
Shouldn't this be a relatively simple matter to bottom?
(Tom said at the Eastern Counties meeting that a complaint had been made to the Disciplinary Committee.)
|