In respect of Tom Wilds comments: The point responded to was NET migration. It stands to reason if people are taking wealth out of the country but immigrants are bringing very little in there is a question of economics. The figures for immigrants far exceeds emigrants...that's the problem. I agree you can't let people emigrate but not let folk immigrate. The two however, should roughly match not only in size but also reflect the places where people from this country emigrate to.
As for the comments about shops etc...if that is the best you can do I give up. I am talking about whole areas of towns becoming Bombay-on-Sea. That is not good for anyone except the 'multiculturalists' who look through paprika-coloured glasses and swoon at smell of curry and sari selling shops.
Ask a non-immigrant 80 year old who lives in the middle of one of these areas and has done all their life. Explain to them why the shops no longer sell the things they like; why the religion people practice is no longer the same as theirs; why they do not understand the signs and conversations people have in the street; why when 'the community' is spoken about it does it not include them...and tell them why mass immigration is such a good thing.
|